GTRE Near Finalizing Foreign Partner for AMCA 110kN Engine Co-Development

GTRE Near Finalizing Foreign Partner for AMCA 110kN Engine Co-Development


India's ambitious Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program is moving closer to securing a crucial engine development partnership, a pivotal step in realizing the country's 5th-generation fighter jet ambitions.

Sources close to the program indicate that the DRDO's Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE) is actively pursuing collaboration with a foreign engine manufacturer.

GTRE's goal is to finalize a partner by mid-2024, laying the groundwork for a contract to be signed later this year or early next. This partnership is essential for the development of a new 5th-generation engine capable of generating 110-130kN of thrust – a considerable power increase necessary for the AMCA MkII variant.

Industry leaders in engine manufacturing, including Rolls-Royce, Safran, and GE, are all potential contenders for this co-development project. The selected engine will power the AMCA MkII, which is slated for production after 2035.

To ensure timely progression in the initial stages of the AMCA program, the initial prototype and the first 40 AMCA MkI units will use the proven GE-F414 engine.

According to industry sources, the co-developed engine is expected to have a wide range of applications. Beyond the AMCA, it could potentially power the Indian Navy's TEDBF program (a carrier-based fighter jet) and even be incorporated into upgraded Tejas MkII jets during their Mid-Life Upgrade (MLU) in the mid-2040s.

This development underscores India's determination to boost its indigenous defense capabilities and reduce reliance on foreign imports.

A successful engine partnership would mark a significant technological leap for the AMCA program and bolster India's position as a rising aerospace power.
 
Ignore the Anglo-Saxon narrative and DoD should go to NPO Saturn for Article 41 (They have already done article 31) jet engine for AMCA- Russia is dying for a partner and India will get a reliable/predictable partner. For an out-of-the-Box thinking, you may also invite UAE as development partner for Financing.
 
Good, but we need this engine to start flying/testing by 2030 - is that possible? Then we need it mass produced by 2035 for AMCA Mk-2, and TEDBF...
Question - assuming we develop this 130KN, mass produced by 2035, what will it take for us then to develop variable cycle engines say in the 200+KN, thrust range (this is what is likely to power NGADs, which are already being tested now and will be deployed before 2030)...
Just asking as it is important to know where does cutting edge stands and how far back we are, and whether we ever plan to not only catch up but move ahead - of course this is a long term game, and we need to play it.
 
Wow ! So optimistic ! We have planned mid life upgrades for Tejas Mk II already.

By the way Tejas Mk1A will be delayed as HAL is producing trainers for now. At the rate of 3 jets per yr, HAL has already delivered 32 jets as on July 2023 and since Aug 2023 another 6 jets are being produced (2 trainers has always been used for enhancement and testing various features since Oct 2022 ). All the 40 jets (incl trainers) will be delivered by Mar 2025 to IAF. Then starts Mk 1A production and will see first delivery by Sep 2025.
 
With the advent of highest degrees of radars and long range intercepting missiles also equally cheapest drones, the days of manned fighter jets are gone and it is very very riskier for our.pilots to be put on board a jet for offence purposes on a foreign soil. We seriously need to drop the obession for more and more jets.
  1. And we need to concentrate on drones, UAV's and another unmaned avionics.
  2. Highly networked war fare system for strong defence
  3. Produce huge number of missiles in varying ranges
  4. Many more AWACS and it's likes
 
India should go for GE. The french are not good when it comes to value for money. And India needs to strenghten partnership with america to counter China. Macron recently visited China and repeated Chinese talking points. Also, GE is developing adaptive cycle engines for NGAD, I know it is a long shot, but chances will be greater that India gets few scraps from that technology, in 15 years or so if India chooses america and GE.
Also 414 deal has very high level of ToT, which shows how keen americans are to deepen partnership with India.
USA will only give old tech and never the core Engine tech
 
Good, but we need this engine to start flying/testing by 2030 - is that possible? Then we need it mass produced by 2035 for AMCA Mk-2, and TEDBF...
Question - assuming we develop this 130KN, mass produced by 2035, what will it take for us then to develop variable cycle engines say in the 200+KN, thrust range (this is what is likely to power NGADs, which are already being tested now and will be deployed before 2030)...
Just asking as it is important to know where does cutting edge stands and how far back we are, and whether we ever plan to not only catch up but move ahead - of course this is a long term game, and we need to play it.
They have not even found a partner. Then India will negotiate for years ....
So No chance
 
Sad to see foreign collaboration for future plan.
No confidence to build up our own.
why GTRE is not collaborating with young brains of IITians/IIScians or Adani/Ambani/Tata private firms.

After all, why foreign collabortion!!!
Fresh out of college grads gonna make one of the most complex piece of technology ever known to mankind? This is an intersection of various disciplines coming together. A fine tuned jet engine is an engineering Marvel which requires tonnes of domain experience even for the finest engineers. Stop idolising iits like those coaching institutewallahs.
 
Whatever plan has been mentioned in this article will only be realized after probably in late 2040s. I can guarantee that.
 
India should go for GE. The french are not good when it comes to value for money. And India needs to strenghten partnership with america to counter China. Macron recently visited China and repeated Chinese talking points. Also, GE is developing adaptive cycle engines for NGAD, I know it is a long shot, but chances will be greater that India gets few scraps from that technology, in 15 years or so if India chooses america and GE.
Also 414 deal has very high level of ToT, which shows how keen americans are to deepen partnership with India.
Idiotic.
French don't have value for money coz they aren't mass producing on the level of the US.
First It needs to be seen if the ToT agreement for the 414 engines is honored in the first place.
Otherwise there are multiple instances in the past.
 
USA will only give old tech and never the core Engine tech
any tech we dont already have is nice. I was reading on some of the tech that is being offered, and it was cutting edge tech. The rest India can develop on its own after spending time and money.
 
Good, but we need this engine to start flying/testing by 2030 - is that possible? Then we need it mass produced by 2035 for AMCA Mk-2, and TEDBF...
Question - assuming we develop this 130KN, mass produced by 2035, what will it take for us then to develop variable cycle engines say in the 200+KN, thrust range (this is what is likely to power NGADs, which are already being tested now and will be deployed before 2030)...
Just asking as it is important to know where does cutting edge stands and how far back we are, and whether we ever plan to not only catch up but move ahead - of course this is a long term game, and we need to play it.
130KN is of future variant, based Variant will be of 110 Kn , Engine would be certified by 2032-34 earliest... Only AMCA mk-2 serial production aircrafts will get these engines earliest
 
For at least last 14 years, search is on for a partner to develop own engine. Yet unable to fix even that much.

At this stage, since we continue to ride on a wave of sarkaari incompetence, please consider Shenyang FC-31 too. Cheap, imported and looks 5th gen too.

Come on, we are prioritizing Plan-B over Plan-A. Any sane country should be pushing our indigenous GTRE Kaveri lock, stock and smoking barrel while considering a foreign partner as Plan-B if everything fails. Yahan ham 15 saal sei partner hi khoj rahe without improving things at GTRE.
problem is that we are incapable of developing an engine for a 5th gen fighter. It would cost too much money. Look at how much china spent and how long it took. They had to spy on america and steal its tech and there is still doubts on china's new engine for J20. India simply does not have that much money, it needs a foreign partner who will help us. We had tried making an engine cost effectively (kaveri) but we failed badly.
 
They have not even found a partner. Then India will negotiate for years ....
So No chance
India has already made a deal with France and Safran to develop a brand new 5th generation jet engine to power the AMCA MK2. With this engine it will teach India on how to design and develop a advanced engine which gives us 100% of the technology, allow to make 100% of it in India and can freely sell to whoever without needing permission.

At the start India will use the GE F414 engine for the first 1-2 squadrons which will give enough time to develop the new engine with France easily.
 
Countries like Turkey and South Korea are were late to the game but now appear to have powered ahead of India in the quest to produce a 5th generation fighter. In the meantime India (GTRE) is looking to foreign countries to help develop fighter engines. Those scientists in charge of running GTRE need to accelerate.
What nonsense! Turkey and South Korea have only developed their jet faster than us is because they use a lot of the technology and parts from the USA and NATO allies. India are developing everything by ourselves without making off the shelf purchases which takes a bit longer but it's better. We can't learn how to design and develop new technology by just making expensive imports as we have to go through the learning cycle.
 
problem is that we are incapable of developing an engine for a 5th gen fighter. It would cost too much money. Look at how much china spent and how long it took. They had to spy on america and steal its tech and there is still doubts on china's new engine for J20. India simply does not have that much money, it needs a foreign partner who will help us. We had tried making an engine cost effectively (kaveri) but we failed badly.
We didn't fail with the Kaveri engine as we successfully developed it with 50kn of dry thrust which will be used on the stealth UCAV Ghatak. We are also developing the Kaveri marine engine which is going through its testing phase which is showing good progress and will power small to medium ships.
 
We didn't fail with the Kaveri engine as we successfully developed it with 50kn of dry thrust which will be used on the stealth UCAV Ghatak. We are also developing the Kaveri marine engine which is going through its testing phase which is showing good progress and will power small to medium ships.
kaveri engine was intended to be used in tejas, but it delivered too little thrust for that purpose. That is a failure. Dry kaveri for ghatak is an effort to salvage so that the effort does not go to waste.
 
India has already made a deal with France and Safran to develop a brand new 5th generation jet engine to power the AMCA MK2. With this engine it will teach India on how to design and develop a advanced engine which gives us 100% of the technology, allow to make 100% of it in India and can freely sell to whoever without needing permission.

At the start India will use the GE F414 engine for the first 1-2 squadrons which will give enough time to develop the new engine with France easily.
Only India thinks it has a deal with Safran/France. Ask Safran and you might get a surprise answer.
 
What nonsense! Turkey and South Korea have only developed their jet faster than us is because they use a lot of the technology and parts from the USA and NATO allies. India are developing everything by ourselves without making off the shelf purchases which takes a bit longer but it's better. We can't learn how to design and develop new technology by just making expensive imports as we have to go through the learning cycle.
The glory is not in how you made the engine/jet, glory is in making a militarily viable engine/jet. Beg, borrow, steal or clone.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,126
Messages
18,817
Members
809
Latest member
Adarsh
Back
Top