India's Missed Flight: Why the An-12 Could Have Changed the Game

India's Missed Flight: Why the An-12 Could Have Changed the Game


Picture those classic workhorse airplanes, the kind that haul cargo and troops in and out of tricky spots. Back in the day, India relied heavily on the Antonov An-12, a sturdy Soviet-era transport plane. But here's where things get interesting – China also used the An-12, though they took a different path. They didn't just buy them; they figured out how to build them themselves, calling their version the Y-8.

That decision turned out to be a game-changer for China. They didn't just copy the An-12; they adapted it, making over 40 different versions! Imagine the same basic plane re-imagined for everything from dropping paratroopers to carrying medical supplies. This massive production boost didn't just fill China's military needs; it helped jumpstart their entire airplane-building industry.

Now, what if India had done the same? Think about it: building the An-12 in India would have put a whole generation of Indian engineers up close and personal with this aircraft. They'd have learned its secrets, its strengths, its weaknesses. That know-how could have fueled India's own airplane designs.

Plus, building planes at home means you don't have to rely on another country for every spare part. It could have made India way more independent when it comes to keeping their aircraft in the skies, maybe even saving money in the long run. And just like China, India could have started tweaking the An-12: better engines, modern electronics, more cargo space – all tailored for India's own unique needs.

Looking back, it seems like India might have missed a golden opportunity by not building An-12s themselves. That experience, that knowledge, could have fast-tracked India's path toward building its own powerful aircraft industry.

Of course, it's too late for the An-12. But that doesn't mean the lesson is lost. Maybe the next time India needs a new military transport, they'll consider building them in partnership with another country. That way, they get the planes they need, and build up their own skills for the future.
 
They are incapable, greedy and crony, so instead of taking risk in R&D they do screw driving. They are the major reason India is not competitive country, but living in colonial times. They agents of foreign countries OEM, AND SHAMELESS THERE TO STOP ANY DEVELOPMENT. rta DIED WHEN tata TOOK OVER AIR iNDIA AND GOT ITS C-295 SINGLE VENDOR DEAL. . bUT an ILLITERATE MIND LOVES NONSENSE and no develop. Always for the cost of foreign product the development of our own product would cost less, but then we have industries to develop , and then we can be a superpower, but bstards do not want India to progress like Tata who did not even have a factory or put up investment till his single vendor deal got passed.
Why on Earth should they take a risk in R&D if they don't see a return from it? Do you know how a private company works? Besides nationalism, they are also answerable to their shareholders. They are willing to invest and make stuff when they know it will sell. Just look at Kalyani, and to a lesser extent, Tata and Mahindra these days. They are slowly working up the ladder.

Secondly, any company has to work it's way up. You can't just tell someone to start manufacturing high-grade hardware from scratch. They need to ease their way in.

"RTA died when Tata took over Air India and got it's C-295 single-vendor deal": What utter nonsense are you on about? RTA was nascent for a long time before Tata re-purchased Air India. Even if Air India had remained nationalised, RTA wasn't going to happen. Moreover, the RTA is in a different class of aircraft entirely than something like an A320 or a Boeing 737 is. There isn't a direct comparison there. Finally, how exactly do you compare a civilian airline's (Air India) orders with a military order for the C-295? Make some sense, would you, please?
 
No one is saying we should open a line for the An-12 today. The article is opining we should have gone for local production under license of the An-12 back in the early 1960s, which was when we started using the type.

It should be remembered that the An-12 even served in 1962. Of course, a production line today makes no sense considering that the type is obsolete, and the IAF phased them out back in 1995.
Ever heard of AN-32 and its travails.
 
We have 11 of the C7 globe master which is second in quantity as compared to the US which has more than the remaining next 5 countries combined. The C130 J is a fine transporter but the C7 Globe master is no less.
 
First point India is not China, their local production of Su27 in 1990s has yielded J-11 to J-15 variants, our HAL has serial produced Su30MKI and yet we cannot maintain timely deliveries of existing aircrafts, we are not one man rule such as China and a lot of ground politics shape the decisions in India along with mindset of "Government Job".
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,234
Messages
20,266
Members
853
Latest member
Cp Saraswat
Back
Top