The Lockheed Martin F-21: A Close Examination of Capabilities and Claims

The Lockheed Martin F-21: A Close Examination of Capabilities and Claims


Lockheed Martin's F-21 fighter jet has emerged as a strong contender in India's competition to acquire 114 Medium Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA). Aggressively marketed as a cutting-edge, near-5th-generation platform, the F-21 is positioned as a transformative addition for the Indian Air Force (IAF). However, closer inspection reveals a more nuanced assessment is required to separate marketing claims from real-world capabilities.

Key Selling Points and Their Scrutiny​

The F-21 is promoted as a significant upgrade over the F-16 Block 52, incorporating features and technologies from the F-22 and F-35. Lockheed Martin highlights the jet's advanced APG-83 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, claiming exceptional detection ranges and targeting ability. Yet, it remains unclear if India would be provided with the radar's source code, which is critical for integration with Indian weapon systems.

Additionally, the inclusion of Triple Missile Launcher Adapters (TMLAs) boosts the number of air-to-air weapons the F-21 can carry. While this may provide a tactical edge, many analysts question the cost this additional drag may have on the aircraft's overall combat effectiveness.

Legacy Systems, Future Aspirations​

Despite Lockheed Martin's claims, critics emphasize the F-21's reliance on a 50-year-old airframe and engine design. These core elements are unlikely to match the performance demanded by next-generation combat scenarios.

Moreover, concerns persist about the alignment of the F-21 with India's goals of indigenous defense manufacturing. Despite 'Make in India' provisions included in the MRFA proposal, the extent of technology transfer and long-term benefits to India's defense industries remain uncertain.

Comparison with 5th Generation Fighters​

Lockheed Martin's presentation of the F-21 as a near-5th-generation fighter invites comparisons with the F-22 and F-35. While there are common elements in supply chains, the key advantages of true stealth capabilities and supercruise offered by the F-22 are absent from the F-21.

Furthermore, direct access to the F-35 seems unlikely, making the promise of interoperability between the platforms a distant possibility.

Conclusion​

The Lockheed Martin F-21 offers some potential advantages for the IAF's modernization program. However, it is essential that India conduct a thorough evaluation of the aircraft's capabilities – both advertised and implied – to ensure it aligns fully with the nation's strategic defense requirements.

A clear-eyed assessment of the F-21's strengths, limitations, and long-term implications is crucial before finalizing such a significant acquisition.
 
F-21 is not the future 30 to 40 years. ….. F-16 is an over rated in fights with incapable adversaries. It’s real test comes in Ukraine.
 
US is desparate to sell its one Fighter jets out of 3 (F-15 eX ,f-18 & f-21).but knowing there is ample of Time for MRFA & evaluation . LM would have made atleast 2 prototype based on F-21 Features . they want to sell dreams. India want to integrate Astra series ,Rudram, Nirbhay & Brahmos-NG on all Future Fighter jets which will b inducted in future.Brahmos-NG being Indo-Russian will LM allow on F-21 (I dont think it will win MRFA). Mark my word US will return with Empty hand in MRFA . Its old design. India wants contemporary .
 
From what is happening to the engine saga and also the support to Pannu, it would be better for India to be cautious in trying to put all egg in one basket and focus on developing indigenous capability.
 
F-21 is not the future 30 to 40 years. ….. F-16 is an over rated in fights with incapable adversaries. It’s real test comes in Ukraine.
Today is for F-21, jets still left in the MRFA list are MIG-35, F/A-18 and F15, probably this week AFI will finish the recommendation of all the jets in MRFA list.
 
This lobby article wants to kill the Tejas, AMCA etc?
No one needs to kill them. HAL and DRDO are doing a great job at that. Trainers yet to be delivered. Mk1a delayed. Mk2 roll out delayed and is now going to take longer than even Tejas. So chill.
 
No one needs to kill them. HAL and DRDO are doing a great job at that. Trainers yet to be delivered. Mk1a delayed. Mk2 roll out delayed and is now going to take longer than even Tejas. So chill.
Hahaha...
HAL should be accorded with "No-Ratna" status among Indian PSUs.

Such a disgrace of an organisation.
National shame - Both its management and its unions.
 
Analysis by paralysis - this is a syndrome which has killed IAF modernization.

IAF did the most detailed analysis of 6 of the world’s top fighter aircraft. After 6 years purchased 36 of the fighter it judged best. Not even exercised the follow on option of next 36 ? Why ? This absolute lack of common sense ? When your Airforce is hitting rock bottom squadron levels ?

Carry on analysis and showing mock-ups of indigenous fighter jets …that will win the war..
 
From what is happening to the engine saga and also the support to Pannu, it would be better for India to be cautious in trying to put all egg in one basket and focus on developing indigenous capability.
If india relies on the likes of HAL & DRDO. Nothing will happen till 2050.
 
Scrap it and buy Rafale F4 and keep updating its capabilities till F5 and beyond. French are giving us an interesting offer for service, assemble, source, manufacture and also in INR transactions.
 
From what is happening to the engine saga and also the support to Pannu, it would be better for India to be cautious in trying to put all egg in one basket and focus on developing indigenous capability.
Yes should not put the eggs in expensive French basket as well as both are same basket, putting the eggs on Indian basket MK2 is the only way going forward if it is 4th gen jet, if GE engine is offered for license manufacturing. French product would cost at-least 4 times the price of F21.
 
2 days back this author recommended purchasing Gripen-E of Saab...
again, Swedish basket is also same US, French and UK Basket, it is just one basket, need either put the eggs in Tejas MK2 or throw them on IAF/HAl’s face for causing delays.
 
Today is for F-21, jets still left in the MRFA list are MIG-35, F/A-18 and F15, probably this week AFI will finish the recommendation of all the jets in MRFA list.
Just wondering what happened to F-35 for us; America is our bosom buddy & will not give us F-35, both variants, one for landing on strip & the other on an AC; F-21 is OK, just a shiny polished F-16, but its not a 4th gen fighter even by a stretch.
 
Just wondering what happened to F-35 for us; America is our bosom buddy & will not give us F-35, both variants, one for landing on strip & the other on an AC; F-21 is OK, just a shiny polished F-16, but its not a 4th gen fighter even by a stretch.
We might get them if we donate our S-400’s to Ukraine.
 
We might get them if we donate our S-400’s to Ukraine.
The way Americans are.. they will not give us F-35s.. They just refused F-35s to UAE & Saudi. They will do a large parade of other shiny stuff for us to get dazzled. Yes, they want our money, but on their terms.
 
Just wondering what happened to F-35 for us; America is our bosom buddy & will not give us F-35, both variants, one for landing on strip & the other on an AC; F-21 is OK, just a shiny polished F-16, but its not a 4th gen fighter even by a stretch.
No F-35’s until we have S-400’s, selection of F-21 would depend on cost, the features/ sensors that it come with and how fast 114 copies can be made and the help with AMCA, if Tata makes them and then use the same facilities to make Tejas MK2 later on we kill two birds with one stone, other Countries doesn’t know anything about 5th gen jet, so they can’t help with AMCA, also I googled for the exact budget allotted for MRFA, it’s only $18Bln and not even $20Bln as many people here say, so there is absolutely no way we could buy 114 Rafale’s with that money, even buying 57 with that money is highly doubtful, so it seems they might select either F-21 or Gripen and make 114 of them. or might just buy 50 Rafales off the shelf with Zero TOT for $18Bln.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,239
Messages
20,471
Members
858
Latest member
joedutt26
Back
Top