Saab Gripen-E vs Tejas Mk1A for Philippines - A Complex Decision Based on Cost, Performance, and Strategic Considerations

Saab Gripen-E vs Tejas Mk1A for Philippines - A Complex Decision Based on Cost, Performance, and Strategic Considerations


In the bidding for a fighter jet contract with the Philippines, the Saab Gripen-E is competing face-to-face with India's Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mk1A. The Tejas is a more affordable option, but the Gripen-E has better performance capabilities, making it a more complicated decision for the Philippines.

Compared to the Gripen-E, which costs $85 million, the Tejas Mk1A is a more affordable option, with a flyaway cost of about $43 million per unit. Given Philippine budgetary constraints, the Tejas is an appealing option due of its notable price differential.

On performance, however, the Gripen-E surpasses the Tejas. It has greater battle range, heavier weapons payload, and maybe more sophisticated sensors and avionics. Depending on the Philippines' unique operating needs and perceptions of threats, these variables may be vital.

There's probably more to the Philippines' choice than just the purchase price. The ultimate decision will also be heavily influenced by additional elements like life-cycle costs, chances for technology transfer, and future upgrade possibility.

India is actively pushing the Tejas Mk1A for export in an effort to become recognised as a trustworthy provider of domestic defence platforms. Getting a contract with the Philippines would be a big step forward for this effort.

The competition's result is still up in the air because both competitors have unique benefits and drawbacks. Before making a final decision, the Philippines will need to carefully consider its priorities and compare the Tejas' cost-effectiveness to the Gripen-E's improved performance.
 
Its really surprise to see that when it comes to HAL you expect quick delivery of a 3 types of 4.5 gen jet with lower price and low order number. But when it comes to privet companies you want full fund from the government, a order of 200-300 units at a time for a single types of jet and with a higher price.. Also the facilities like lower tax, cheap electricity, cheap land...etc.. etc.. are additional. Are you thinking HAL is doing charity..??? HAL has Money tree or Alladin ke Chirag ??
It is really surprising to see that when it comes to HAL, you want them to get all the orders, you want them to get all the ToT, free land, free paintings, upfront advance to pay for all the capex and opex, etc. You are also okay with delayed deliveries, a super heavy profit margin of 22% (unheard of in the heavy industry segment of India), no major exports etc.

But when it comes to private companies, you don’t want the government to give them any deals, you want them to invest billions without any tenders, you don’t want any tax benefits, you don’t want any tenders to be open to them. All this despite punctual deliveries and a lion’s share in exports.

Do you think private companies have an Alibaba ki gufa to get money from and give it to the government?
 
It is really surprising to see that when it comes to HAL, you want them to get all the orders, you want them to get all the ToT, free land, free paintings, upfront advance to pay for all the capex and opex, etc. You are also okay with delayed deliveries, a super heavy profit margin of 22% (unheard of in the heavy industry segment of India), no major exports etc.

But when it comes to private companies, you don’t want the government to give them any deals, you want them to invest billions without any tenders, you don’t want any tax benefits, you don’t want any tenders to be open to them. All this despite punctual deliveries and a lion’s share in exports.

Do you think private companies have an Alibaba ki gufa to get money from and give it to the government?
I want private sector to invest in R&D.. army releases GSQR.. as per that or similar products foreign OEM offers... Compete in tender and win.. when they are earning from indian market they must invest for India's security also.. without India they will also doesn't exist.. compete with DRDO.. that's what I want
 
Facing stiff competition itself is an achievement. Pakistani JF 17 jets always run away before the competition starts.
 
I want private sector to invest in R&D.. army releases GSQR.. as per that or similar products foreign OEM offers... Compete in tender and win.. when they are earning from indian market they must invest for India's security also.. without India they will also doesn't exist.. compete with DRDO.. that's what I want
But DRDO is getting free money. Without Indian government’s money DRDO won’t exist either. So why should there be such unequal competition between here one is getting unlimited money and free tenders and no responsibility while other gets no money and their bank guarantees are confiscated when they miss the deadline by even a day? Either give money to both or don’t give it to either. How can anyone compete in such an unequal market?

What is DRDO doing? It is getting free money, and is doing R&D from it. And it is failing at it. So true competition would be when private companies also get money like DRDO does. Then ask them to do R&D. How can you support such an unfair treatment? And if DRDO had delivered then also it was acceptable. But when CAG itself says that DRDO is nothing but a machine of lies, then why shall we give them a single penny?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,253
Messages
20,436
Members
857
Latest member
Philljones22
Back
Top